Climate-driven Range Shifts Threaten Keystone Endemic Figs of Java: Complementing IUCN Red List Assessment with Species Distribution Modelling to Guide Conservation Priorities

Main Article Content

Rosniati Apriani Risna
Eimear Nic Lughadha
Lilik Budi Prasetyo
Sutomo Sutomo
Muhammad Nur Aidi
Jack Francis Plummer
Damayanti Buchori
Dian Latifah
Ade Yusup Yuswandi
Angga Irfandi Yudistira

Abstract

RISNA, R. A., LUGHADHA, E. N., PRASETYO, L. B., SUTOMO, AIDI, M. N., BUCHORI, D., PLUMMER, J., LATIFAH, D., YUSWANDI, A. Y.  & YUDISTIRA, A. I. 2026. Climate-driven range shifts threaten keystone endemic figs of Java: complementing IUCN Red List assessment with species distribution modelling to guide conservation priorities. Reinwardtia 25(1): 49‒63. — This study evaluates the extinction risk and climate-driven habitat dynamics of two endemic figs of Java, Ficus trachycoma Miq. and F. miqueliana C.C.Berg. Both species are poorly known, with no confirmed field records for more than six decades. Conservation status was assessed under IUCN Red List criteria, with extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) calculated using validated herbarium records. Ficus trachycoma is restricted to a single 19th-century locality, with an EOO and AOO of 4 km², a single known location, and continuing decline in habitat, qualifying it as Critically Endangered. Ficus miqueliana has been more widely recorded, with an AOO of 20 km² and an EOO of about 600 km², ≤5 locations, and continuing decline in habitat, meeting the thresholds for Endangered. Species distribution modelling using MaxEnt and CMIP6 climate projections (SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5) was applied to predict current and future habitat suitability. The models performed with high accuracy (AUC = 0.912‒0.935, TSS = 1.0) and identified slope (52–73% contribution), temperature seasonality, and precipitation in the wettest, warmest, and coldest quarters as key predictors of occurrence. Ficus miqueliana’s current suitable habitat is 16,233 km² (12.4% of Java) in fragmented lowland and foothill forests. CMIP6 projections (MIROC6, SSP2-4.5/SSP5-8.5 for 2050s and 2090s) forecast net contractions with upslope shifts: mid-century losses of 9–11% in Java, late-century persistence in montane refugia under moderate emissions but severe fragmentation under high emissions. These findings demonstrate that both endemic figs are highly vulnerable to environmental change. Applying IUCN Red List assessments alongside species distribution modelling provides a replicable framework for evaluating extinction risk in data-limited species and identifies priority areas for climate-adaptive conservation planning on Java.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Risna, R. A., Lughadha, E. N., Prasetyo, L. B., Sutomo, S., Aidi, M. N., Plummer, J. F., … Yudistira, A. I. (2026). Climate-driven Range Shifts Threaten Keystone Endemic Figs of Java: Complementing IUCN Red List Assessment with Species Distribution Modelling to Guide Conservation Priorities. Reinwardtia, 25(1), 49–63. Retrieved from https://biologyjournal.brin.go.id/index.php/reinwardtia/article/view/635
Section
Articles

References

ANILKUMAR, C., CHITRA, C. R., BINDU, S. & PADMESH, P. 2008. Seed germination and storage studies in Ficus krishnae C. DC. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 13 (1): 66–72.

BACHMAN, S., MOAT, J., HILL, A. W., DE LATORRE, J. & SCOTT, B. 2011. Supporting red list threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 150: 117–126. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.150. 2109.

BACHMAN, S. P., BROWN, M. J. M., LEÃO, T. C. C., NIC LUGHADHA, E. & WALKER, B. E. 2024. Extinction risk predictions for the world’s flowering plants to support their conservation. New Phytologist 242(2): 797–808. DOI: 10.1111/nph.19592.

BARLOW, J., FRANCA, F., GARDNER, T. A., HICKS, C. C., LENNOX, G. D., BERENGUER, E., CASTELLO, L., ECONOMO, E. P., FERREIRA, J., GUENARD, B., LEAL, C. G., ISAAC, V., LEES, A. C., PARR, C. L., WILSON, S. K., YOUNG, P. J. & GRAHAM, N. A. J. 2018. The future of hyperdiverse tropical ecosystems. Nature 559: 517–526. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0301-1.

BERG, C. C., CORNER, E. J. H. & JARRETT, F. M., 2006. Moraceae (genera other than Ficus). Flora Malesiana, ser. 1. 17 (1): 1–154. http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/document/614214. (Accessed 15 January 2023).

CHANTARASUWAN, B. 2014. Taxonomy, systematics, and biogeography of Ficus subsection Urostigma (Moraceae). Leiden University, Leiden. [PhD Thesis].

CHEN, I. -C., HILL, J. K., OHLEMULLER, R., ROY, D. B. & THOMAS, C. D. 2012. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high level of climate warming. Science 333: 1024–1026. DOI: 10.1126/science.1206432.

CORLETT, R.T. & WESTCOTT, D. A. 2013. Will plant movements keep up with climate change ? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28 (8): 482–488. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.04. 003.

ELITH, J., PHILLIPS, S. J., HASTIE, T., DUDÍK, M., CHEE, Y. E. & YATES, C. J. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 17(1): 43–57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x.

FEELEY, K. J., BERNAL-ESCOBAR, M., FORTIER, R. & KULLBERG, A. T. 2023. Tropical trees will need to acclimate to rising temperatures—but can they? Plants 12(17): Art. 3142. DOI: 10.3390/plants12173142.

FICK, S. E. & HIJMANS, R. J. 2017. World clim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37(12): 4302–4315. DOI: 10.100 2/joc.5086.

GBIF.ORG, 2022a. GBIF occurrence download: Ficus miqueliana C.C. Berg. http:/www.gbif.org. (Accessed 5 January 2022).

GBIF.ORG, 2022b. GBIF occurrence download: Ficus trachycoma Miq. http:/www.gbif.org. (Accessed 5 Jan 2022).

GEONAMES, 2022. GeoNames: Geographical database. http:/www.geonames.org. (Accessed 1 Oct 2022).

GLOBAL FOREST WATCH, 2023. Primary forest loss in Jawa Timur, Indonesia. Global Forest Watch. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/aoi/67500e3eb1475500206d705c/?map=eyJjYW5Cb3VuZCI6dHJ1ZX0%3D (Accessed 3 January 2024).

GOGOI, A. P., SETHY, J., KUMAR, A., PARBO, D., CHATAKONDA, M. K. & MALETHA, A. 2023. Vertebrate assemblages on fruiting figs in the Indian Eastern Himalaya’s Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary. Journal of Threatened Taxa 15(10): 23977–23989. DOI: 10.11609/jott.8549.15.10.23977-23989.

HOYLE, G. L., SOMMERVILLE, K. D., LIYANAGE, G. S., WORBOYS, S., GUJA, L.K., STEVENS, A. V. & CRAYN, D. M. 2023. Seed banking is more applicable to the preservation of tropical montane flora than previously assumed: A review and cloud forest case study. Global Ecology and Conservation 47: Art. e02627. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023. e02627.

IUCN. 2024. The IUCN Red List of threatened species - Version 2023-1. https://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed 26 Jan 2024).

IUCN STANDARDS AND PETITIONS COMMITTEE. 2024. Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 16. https://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf. (Accessed 26 Nov 2024).

JOSE, J. K. 2025. Extinction alarm for trees. Ambio 54(9): 1559–1562. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-025-02190-0.

KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN RI. 2024. Peta interaktif SIGAP Kementerian Kehutanan. Available from: https://geoportal.menlhk.go. id/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id= 2ee8bdda1d714899955fccbe7fdf8468. (Acces-sed 24 February 2024).

LI, X., WANG, Z., WANG, S. & QIAN, Z. 2024. MaxEnt and Marxan modeling to predict the potential habitat and priority planting areas of Coffea arabica in Yunnan, China under climate change scenario. Frontiers in Plant Science: 1–21. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1471653.

LIAO, D., ZHOU, B., XIAO, H., ZHANG, Y., ZHANG, S., SU, Q. & YAN, X. 2025. MaxEnt modeling of the impacts of human activities and climate change on the potential distribution of Plantago in China. Biology 14: 564. DOI: 10.3390/ biology14050564.

MACKAY, K. D., GROSS, C. L. & ROSSETTO, M. 2018. Small populations of fig trees offer a keystone food resource and conservation benefits for declining insectivorous birds. Global Ecology and Conservation 14: Art. e00403. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00403.

MAPBIOMAS, 2025. MapBiomas Project Collection 4.0 of the Annual Land Use and Land Cover Maps of Indonesia. Available from: https://platform.indonesia.mapbiomas.org/. (Accessed 28 November 2025).

MARJAKANGAS, E. L., ABREGO, N., GRØTAN, V., DE LIMA, R. A. F., BELLO, C., BOVENDORP, R. S., CULOT, L., HASUI, É., LIMA, F., MUYLAERT, R. L., NIEBUHR, B. B., OLIVEIRA, A. A., PEREIRA, L. A., PRADO, P. I., STEVENS, R. D., VANCINE, M. H., RIBEIRO, M. C., GALETTI, M. & OVASKAINEN, O. 2020. Fragmented tropical forests lose mutualistic plant–animal interactions. Diversity and Distributions 26(2): 154–168.

NGUYEN, P. L., ALEXANDER, L. V., THATCHER, M. J., TRUONG, S. C. H., ISPHORDING, R. N. & MCGREGOR, J. L., 2024. Selecting CMIP6 global climate models (GCMs) for Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) dyna-mical downscaling over Southeast Asia using a standardized benchmarking framework. Geoscientific Model Development 17(19): 7285–7315.

O’NEILL, B. C., TEBALDI, C., VAN VUUREN, D. P., EYRING, V., FRIEDLINGSTEIN, P., HURTT, G., KNUTTI, R., KRIEGLER, E., LAMARQUE, J. F., LOWE, J., MEEHL, G. A., MOSS, R., RIAHI, K. & SANDERSON, B. M. 2016. The scenario model intercomparison project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geoscientific Model Development 9(9): 3461–3482. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016.

OSM. 2025. Open Street Map. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=3/-2.55/118.02. (Accessed 23 November 2025).

PENIWIDIYANTI, QAYIM, I. & CHIKMAWATI, T. 2022. A study on diversity and distribution of figs (Ficus, Moraceae) in Bogor City, West Java, Indonesia. Journal of Tropical Biodiversity and Biotechnology 7(2): 1–15. DOI: 10.22146/jtbb.68516.

PHILLIPS, S. J., ANDERSON, R. P. & SCHAPIRE, R. E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190(3–4): 231–259. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026.

POWO, 2024. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. https://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org. (Accessed 26 January 2024).

PRASETYO, E., SETIAWAN, F., WIDIYATNO, NA’IEM, M., OHASHI, H., TSUMURA, Y., TSUYAMA, I. & MATSUI, T. 2022. Predicting Tectona grandis suitability to evaluate potential plantation areas under future climate on Java, Indonesia. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 56(3): 269–281. DOI:10.609 0/jarq.56.269.

PRASETYO, L. B., KARTODIHARDJO, H., ADIWIBOWO, S., OKARDA, B. & SETIAWAN, Y. 2009. Spatial model approach on deforestation of Java Island, Indonesia. Journal of Integrated Field Science 6: 37–44. http://hdl.handle.net/10097/48779.

VAN PROOSDIJ, A. S. J., SOSEF, M. S. M., WIERINGA, J. J. & RAES, N. 2016. Minimum required number of specimen records to develop accurate species distribution models. Ecography 39(6): 542–552. DOI: 10.1111/ecog. 01509.

QAZI, A. W., SAQIB, Z. & ZAMAN-UL-HAQ, M. 2022. Trends in species distribution modelling in context of rare and endemic plants: a systematic review. Ecological Processes 11(1): Art. 40. DOI: 10.1186/s13717-022-00384-y.

QGIS DEVELOPMENT TEAM, 2023. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open source geospatial foundation project. Available from: http//qgis.org. (Accessed 17 January 2023).

R CORE TEAM. 2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: https://www.r-project.org. (Accessed 17 January 2023).

RADOSAVLJEVIC, A. & ANDERSON, R. P. 2014. Making better Maxent models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation. Journal of Biogeography 41: 629–643. DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12227.

RATHORE, M. K. & SHARMA, L. K. 2023. Efficacy of species distribution models (SDMs) for ecological realms to ascertain biological conservation and practices. Biodiversity and Conservation 32(10): 3053–3087. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-023-02648-1.

SAMPAIO, A. C. P. & CAVALCANTE, A. de M. B. 2023. Accurate species distribution models: minimum required number of specimen records in the Caatinga biome. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 95(2): Art. e20201421 (1–11). DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202320201421.

SER, INSR & RBGK. 2023. Seed Information Database. Available from: https://ser-sid.org (Accessed 11 December 2025).

SETIAWAN, Y. & YOSHINO, K., 2014. Detecting land-use change from seasonal vegetation dynamics on regional scale with MODIS EVI 250-m time-series imagery. Journal of Land Use Science 9(3): 304–330. DOI: 10.1080/ 1747423X.2013.786151.

SHARROCK, S., HOFT, R. & DIAS, B. F. de S 2018. An overview of recent progress in the implementation of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation – a global perspective. Rodriguésia 69(4): 1489–1511. DOI: 10.1590/ 2175-7860201869401.

SILVA, S. V., ANDERMANN, T., ZIZKA, A., KOZLOWSKI, G. & SILVESTRO, D. 2022. Global estimation and mapping of the conservation status of tree species using artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.839792.

SOFAER, H. R., JARNEVICH, C. S., PEARSE, I. S., SMYTH, R. L., AUER, S., COOK, G. L., EDWARDS, T. C., GUALA, G. F., HOWARD, T. G., MORISETTE, J. T. & HAMILTON, H. 2019. Development and delivery of species distribution models to inform decision-making. BioScience 69(7): 544–557. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biz045.

STRUEBIG, M. J., WENZLER, M., RUNTING, R. K., LAW, E., BUDIHARTA, S., SEAMAN, D. & KRAMER-SCHADT, S. 2024. Connectivity conservation to mitigate climate and land-cover change impacts on Borneo. Biological Conservation 299: Art. 110838. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110838.

TEJEDOR-GARAVITO, N., NEWTON, A. C., GOLICHER, D. & OLDFIELD, S. 2015. The relative impact of climate change on the extinction risk of tree species in the Montane Tropical Andes. PLOS ONE 10(7): Art. E0131388 (1–19). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone. 013 1388.

URBAN, M. C. 2015. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348 (6234): 571–573. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa4984.

VAN VANKELBURG, J. L. C. H. & BUNYAPRAPHATSARA, N. (Eds.). 2002. Medicinal and Poisonous Plants. PROSEA Foundation, Bogor, Indonesia.

WORLDPOP. 2025. Worldpop hub. https://www.hub.worldpop.org/geodata/listing?id=135. (Accessed 23 November 2025).

YUSUF, R. 2011. Ecological distribution and diversity of Ficus spp. in Indonesia. Berkala Penelitian Hayati Edisi Khusus: 83–91. (In Indonesian).